Shortcut vs Trello——哪个更胜一筹？
选 Shortcut，如果你: 用Trello不够了但觉得Jira太窒息的软件团队——10-100人工程团队的甜蜜点
选 Trello，如果你: 习惯看板思维、追求零摩擦的小团队和个人用户
我们的看法: Shortcut for simplicity, Trello for power users.
| Shortcut | Trello | |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free with unlimited cards and up to 10 boards | Standard $5/user/mo |
| 功能 | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams | Kanban boards, Power-Ups (integrations), Butler automation, Card templates, Calendar and timeline views (Premium) |
| 最适合 | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers | Small teams and individuals who think in kanban and want zero friction |
| 学习曲线 | 中等 | 简单 |
真正的区别
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Shortcut stands out with Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations and Docs and wikis inside the project tool. Trello counters with Power-Ups (integrations) and Butler automation.
Shortcut's Achilles heel: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Trello's: falls apart for complex projects — no native gantt, limited reporting, and boards get unwieldy past 50 cards. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
最终结论
If you value deep github, gitlab, and sentry integrations and 用trello不够了但觉得jira太窒息的软件团队——10-100人工程团队的甜蜜点, go with Shortcut. If 习惯看板思维、追求零摩擦的小团队和个人用户 matters more, Trello is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.