Linear vs Teamwork——哪个更胜一筹？
选 Linear，如果你: 想要市面上最快、最有态度的issue tracker的工程团队
选 Teamwork，如果你: 需要把计费工时跟踪内嵌到项目管理中的代理商和客户服务团队
我们的看法: Linear is easier to pick up, but Teamwork is more powerful long-term.
| Linear | Teamwork | |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | Free for up to 250 issues | Standard $8/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Deliver $13.99/user/mo |
| 功能 | Keyboard-first navigation, Cycles and roadmaps, Git and PR integrations, Triage and auto-assignment, Sub-issues and relations | Client-facing project views, Time tracking and billing, Workload and profitability reporting, Task dependencies and milestones, Built-in chat |
| 最适合 | Engineering teams that want the fastest, most opinionated issue tracker on the market | Agencies and client services teams that need billable time tracking baked into project management |
| 学习曲线 | 简单 | 中等 |
真正的区别
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Linear stands out with Keyboard-first navigation and Cycles and roadmaps. Teamwork counters with Client-facing project views and Time tracking and billing.
Linear's Achilles heel: built for devs by devs — non-technical teams will feel alienated by the workflow assumptions. Teamwork's: the interface feels enterprise-heavy for small teams — too many menus for simple projects. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
最终结论
If you value keyboard-first navigation and 想要市面上最快、最有态度的issue tracker的工程团队, go with Linear. If 需要把计费工时跟踪内嵌到项目管理中的代理商和客户服务团队 matters more, Teamwork is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.