InVision vs Penpot——哪个更胜一筹？
选 InVision，如果你: 需要轻量原型设计和白板工具来配合现有设计工具的团队
选 Penpot，如果你: 想要自托管Figma替代品、不被厂商锁定的开源拥护者
我们的看法: InVision is easier to pick up, but Penpot is more powerful long-term.
| InVision | Penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo | Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricing |
| 功能 | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode | Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototyping |
| 最适合 | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools | Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-in |
| 学习曲线 | 简单 | 中等 |
真正的区别
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
InVision stands out with Freehand whiteboard and Inspect for developer handoff. Penpot counters with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design.
InVision's Achilles heel: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Penpot's: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
最终结论
If you value freehand whiteboard and 需要轻量原型设计和白板工具来配合现有设计工具的团队, go with InVision. If 想要自托管figma替代品、不被厂商锁定的开源拥护者 matters more, Penpot is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.