InVision vs Marvel——哪个更胜一筹？
选 InVision，如果你: 需要轻量原型设计和白板工具来配合现有设计工具的团队
选 Marvel，如果你: 想从线框图到可点击原型走最短路径、还自带用户测试的UX团队
我们的看法: InVision for simplicity, Marvel for power users.
| InVision | Marvel | |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo | Free for 1 project | Pro $12/user/mo |
| 功能 | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode | Rapid prototyping, User testing built-in, Design handoff specs, Wireframing tools, Sketch and Figma import |
| 最适合 | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools | UX teams that want the fastest path from wireframe to clickable prototype with built-in user testing |
| 学习曲线 | 简单 | 简单 |
真正的区别
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
InVision stands out with Freehand whiteboard and Inspect for developer handoff. Marvel counters with Rapid prototyping and User testing built-in.
InVision's Achilles heel: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Marvel's: not a full design tool — you still need figma or sketch for actual visual design work. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
最终结论
If you value freehand whiteboard and 需要轻量原型设计和白板工具来配合现有设计工具的团队, go with InVision. If 想从线框图到可点击原型走最短路径、还自带用户测试的ux团队 matters more, Marvel is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.