iCloud vs Sync.com——哪个更胜一筹?

一句话总结

选 iCloud,如果你: 想要无脑备份和同步的Apple用户——全套Apple设备的话确实好用

选 Sync.com,如果你: 把隐私放第一位、想要默认包含zero-knowledge加密且不额外收费的团队

我们的看法: iCloud for simplicity, Sync.com for power users.

 iCloudSync.com
价格Free 5GB with any Apple ID | iCloud+ 50GB $0.99/mo5 GB free | Teams Standard $6/user/mo (1 TB)
功能Seamless sync across iPhone, iPad, and Mac, iCloud Drive with Finder and Files app integration, Private Relay for anonymous web browsing (paid), Hide My Email for disposable addresses, Shared family storage with up to 5 membersEnd-to-end encryption by default, Zero-knowledge privacy, HIPAA and GDPR compliant, File requests and sharing, Vault for archived files
最适合Apple users who want effortless backup and sync without thinking about it — it just works if you are all-in on ApplePrivacy-first teams that want zero-knowledge encryption included by default with no extra cost
学习曲线简单简单

真正的区别

Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.

iCloud stands out with Seamless sync across iPhone, iPad, and Mac and iCloud Drive with Finder and Files app integration. Sync.com counters with End-to-end encryption by default and Zero-knowledge privacy.

iCloud's Achilles heel: terrible experience on windows and android — and 5gb free in 2026 is embarrassingly stingy. Sync.com's: no native document editing — you have to download files, edit locally, and re-sync every time. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.

最终结论

If you value seamless sync across iphone, ipad, and mac and 想要无脑备份和同步的apple用户——全套apple设备的话确实好用, go with iCloud. If 把隐私放第一位、想要默认包含zero-knowledge加密且不额外收费的团队 matters more, Sync.com is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.

常见问题

相关对比