Height vs Shortcut——哪个更胜一筹？
选 Height，如果你: 想要AI深度嵌入每个项目操作而不是外挂的产品和工程团队
选 Shortcut，如果你: 用Trello不够了但觉得Jira太窒息的软件团队——10-100人工程团队的甜蜜点
我们的看法: Height for simplicity, Shortcut for power users.
| Height | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| 功能 | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| 最适合 | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| 学习曲线 | 中等 | 中等 |
真正的区别
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Height stands out with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Height's Achilles heel: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
最终结论
If you value ai-powered task creation and prioritization and 想要ai深度嵌入每个项目操作而不是外挂的产品和工程团队, go with Height. If 用trello不够了但觉得jira太窒息的软件团队——10-100人工程团队的甜蜜点 matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.