Evernote vs Tana——哪个更胜一筹？
选 Evernote，如果你: 经常剪藏网页内容、需要强大全文搜索的用户
选 Tana，如果你: 想用结构化、可查询的笔记打造个人操作系统的高级用户
我们的看法: Evernote is easier to pick up, but Tana is more powerful long-term.
| Evernote | Tana | |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | Free with 60MB/mo uploads and 1 device | Personal $14.99/mo | Free for personal use | Tana Pro $10/mo |
| 功能 | Web clipper, Document scanning, Search inside images and PDFs, Task management, Calendar integration | Supertag-based schema system, Live search nodes, Command node automations, AI integration built-in, Outliner with structured data |
| 最适合 | People who clip a lot of web content and want powerful search across all their notes | Power users who want to build their own personal operating system with structured, queryable notes |
| 学习曲线 | 简单 | 较难 |
真正的区别
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Evernote stands out with Web clipper and Document scanning. Tana counters with Supertag-based schema system and Live search nodes.
Evernote's Achilles heel: has been declining for years — frequent price hikes, lost features, and the free plan is now nearly unusable at 1 device. Tana's: steep learning cliff — the supertag concept is powerful but takes days to grok properly. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
最终结论
If you value web clipper and 经常剪藏网页内容、需要强大全文搜索的用户, go with Evernote. If 想用结构化、可查询的笔记打造个人操作系统的高级用户 matters more, Tana is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.