Capacities vs Roam Research——哪个更胜一筹？
选 Capacities，如果你: 想要Notion的灵活性、又想要更个人化的面向对象知识系统的视觉思考者
选 Roam Research，如果你: 用关联思维思考、需要块级双向链接的研究者和写作者
我们的看法: Capacities for simplicity, Roam Research for power users.
| Capacities | Roam Research | |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | Free for personal use | Pro $9.99/mo | No free plan | Pro $15/mo |
| 功能 | Object-based note system, Daily notes and journals, Media management, Tag-based organization, Graph view of connections | Bidirectional linking, Block-level references, Daily notes workflow, Graph overview, Custom CSS and JavaScript |
| 最适合 | Visual thinkers who want Notion’s flexibility with a more personal, object-oriented knowledge system | Researchers and writers who think in connected ideas and want block-level linking |
| 学习曲线 | 中等 | 较难 |
真正的区别
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Capacities stands out with Object-based note system and Media management. Roam Research counters with Bidirectional linking and Block-level references.
Capacities's Achilles heel: young product with missing features — no api, limited integrations, and collaboration is early-stage. Roam Research's: no free plan, web-only (no native desktop), and the community has shrunk as obsidian and logseq grew. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
最终结论
If you value object-based note system and 想要notion的灵活性、又想要更个人化的面向对象知识系统的视觉思考者, go with Capacities. If 用关联思维思考、需要块级双向链接的研究者和写作者 matters more, Roam Research is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.