Asana vs Shortcut——哪个更胜一筹？
选 Asana，如果你: 需要结构化项目工作流、又不想搞太复杂的中型团队
选 Shortcut，如果你: 用Trello不够了但觉得Jira太窒息的软件团队——10-100人工程团队的甜蜜点
我们的看法: Asana for simplicity, Shortcut for power users.
| Asana | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| 功能 | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| 最适合 | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| 学习曲线 | 中等 | 中等 |
真正的区别
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Workflow automation and Custom fields and forms. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
最终结论
If you value workflow automation and 需要结构化项目工作流、又不想搞太复杂的中型团队, go with Asana. If 用trello不够了但觉得jira太窒息的软件团队——10-100人工程团队的甜蜜点 matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.