Lever vs Rippling — Qual vence?

Resumo

Escolha Lever se: Empresas mid-market que querem capacidades de CRM de recrutamento misturadas com ATS pra sourcing proativo

Escolha Rippling se: Empresas em crescimento que querem RH, TI e gestão de dispositivos unificados numa plataforma com folha global

Nossa opinião: Lever for simplicity, Rippling for power users.

 LeverRippling
PreçosLeverTRM custom pricingStarts at $8/user/mo
FuncionalidadesATS + CRM in one platform, Diversity and inclusion analytics, Interview scheduling and scorecards, Nurture campaigns for passive candidates, Visual pipeline managementUnified HR, IT, and finance platform, Global payroll in 50+ countries, Device management, App provisioning and SSO, Custom workflow automation
Melhor paraMid-market companies that want recruiting CRM capabilities blended with ATS for proactive sourcingGrowing companies that want HR, IT, and device management unified in one platform with global payroll
Curva de aprendizadoMédioMédio

A diferença real

Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.

Lever stands out with ATS + CRM in one platform and Diversity and inclusion analytics. Rippling counters with Unified HR, IT, and finance platform and Global payroll in 50+ countries.

Lever's Achilles heel: no public pricing — you’re forced into a sales call, and it’s not cheap once you get the quote. Rippling's: modular pricing means costs stack up fast — the base is cheap but every add-on module costs extra. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.

Conclusão

If you value ats + crm in one platform and empresas mid-market que querem, go with Lever. If empresas em crescimento que matters more, Rippling is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.

Perguntas frequentes

Comparações relacionadas