Height vs Trello — Qual vence?
Escolha Height se: Times de produto e engenharia que querem AI integrada em cada ação de projeto — não adicionada por cima
Escolha Trello se: Times pequenos e indivíduos que pensam em kanban e querem zero atrito
Nossa opinião: Height for simplicity, Trello for power users.
| Height | Trello | |
|---|---|---|
| Preços | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free with unlimited cards and up to 10 boards | Standard $5/user/mo |
| Funcionalidades | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support | Kanban boards, Power-Ups (integrations), Butler automation, Card templates, Calendar and timeline views (Premium) |
| Melhor para | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on | Small teams and individuals who think in kanban and want zero friction |
| Curva de aprendizado | Médio | Fácil |
A diferença real
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Height stands out with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering. Trello counters with Kanban boards and Power-Ups (integrations).
Height's Achilles heel: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Trello's: falls apart for complex projects — no native gantt, limited reporting, and boards get unwieldy past 50 cards. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusão
If you value ai-powered task creation and prioritization and times de produto e, go with Height. If times pequenos e indivíduos matters more, Trello is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.