Height vs Linear — Qual vence?
Escolha Height se: Times de produto e engenharia que querem AI integrada em cada ação de projeto — não adicionada por cima
Escolha Linear se: Times de engenharia que querem o issue tracker mais rápido e opinativo do mercado
Nossa opinião: Height for simplicity, Linear for power users.
| Height | Linear | |
|---|---|---|
| Preços | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 250 issues | Standard $8/user/mo |
| Funcionalidades | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support | Keyboard-first navigation, Cycles and roadmaps, Git and PR integrations, Triage and auto-assignment, Sub-issues and relations |
| Melhor para | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on | Engineering teams that want the fastest, most opinionated issue tracker on the market |
| Curva de aprendizado | Médio | Fácil |
A diferença real
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Height stands out with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering. Linear counters with Keyboard-first navigation and Cycles and roadmaps.
Height's Achilles heel: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Linear's: built for devs by devs — non-technical teams will feel alienated by the workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusão
If you value ai-powered task creation and prioritization and times de produto e, go with Height. If times de engenharia que matters more, Linear is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.