Greenhouse vs Rippling — Qual vence?
Escolha Greenhouse se: Empresas em escala que querem processos de contratação estruturados e com menos viés, com analytics sérios e compliance
Escolha Rippling se: Empresas em crescimento que querem RH, TI e gestão de dispositivos unificados numa plataforma com folha global
Nossa opinião: Greenhouse for simplicity, Rippling for power users.
| Greenhouse | Rippling | |
|---|---|---|
| Preços | Essential custom pricing | Starts at $8/user/mo |
| Funcionalidades | Structured hiring methodology, Interview kits and scorecards, DE&I tracking and analytics, Onboarding module, 500+ integrations | Unified HR, IT, and finance platform, Global payroll in 50+ countries, Device management, App provisioning and SSO, Custom workflow automation |
| Melhor para | Scaling companies that want structured, bias-reduced hiring processes with serious analytics and compliance | Growing companies that want HR, IT, and device management unified in one platform with global payroll |
| Curva de aprendizado | Médio | Médio |
A diferença real
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Greenhouse stands out with Structured hiring methodology and Interview kits and scorecards. Rippling counters with Unified HR, IT, and finance platform and Global payroll in 50+ countries.
Greenhouse's Achilles heel: enterprise pricing with zero transparency — expect $6,000–15,000+/year depending on headcount. Rippling's: modular pricing means costs stack up fast — the base is cheap but every add-on module costs extra. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusão
If you value structured hiring methodology and empresas em escala que, go with Greenhouse. If empresas em crescimento que matters more, Rippling is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.