Figma vs InVision — Qual vence?
Escolha Figma se: Times de design que precisam de colaboração em tempo real e handoff perfeito pro dev
Escolha InVision se: Times que precisam de prototipagem leve e whiteboarding junto com ferramentas de design existentes
Nossa opinião: Figma for simplicity, InVision for power users.
| Figma | InVision | |
|---|---|---|
| Preços | Free for up to 3 projects | Professional $12/editor/mo | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo |
| Funcionalidades | Real-time collaboration, Auto Layout, Component variants and variables, Dev mode for handoff, FigJam whiteboard | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode |
| Melhor para | Design teams that need real-time collaboration and seamless developer handoff | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools |
| Curva de aprendizado | Médio | Fácil |
A diferença real
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Figma stands out with Real-time collaboration and Auto Layout. InVision counters with Freehand whiteboard and Prototyping and animations.
Figma's Achilles heel: requires internet connection — offline mode is limited and the desktop app is basically a browser wrapper. InVision's: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusão
If you value real-time collaboration and times de design que, go with Figma. If times que precisam de matters more, InVision is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.