Asana vs Shortcut — Qual vence?
Escolha Asana se: Times médios que precisam de workflows estruturados de projeto sem complexidade de desenvolvedor
Escolha Shortcut se: Times de software que superaram o Trello mas acham o Jira sufocante — o ponto ideal pra 10-100 engenheiros
Nossa opinião: Asana for simplicity, Shortcut for power users.
| Asana | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| Preços | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| Funcionalidades | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| Melhor para | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| Curva de aprendizado | Médio | Médio |
A diferença real
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Workflow automation and Custom fields and forms. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusão
If you value workflow automation and times médios que precisam, go with Asana. If times de software que matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.