Asana vs Height — Qual vence?
Escolha Asana se: Times médios que precisam de workflows estruturados de projeto sem complexidade de desenvolvedor
Escolha Height se: Times de produto e engenharia que querem AI integrada em cada ação de projeto — não adicionada por cima
Nossa opinião: Asana for simplicity, Height for power users.
| Asana | Height | |
|---|---|---|
| Preços | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| Funcionalidades | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support |
| Melhor para | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on |
| Curva de aprendizado | Médio | Médio |
A diferença real
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Timeline and Gantt views and Workflow automation. Height counters with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Height's: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusão
If you value timeline and gantt views and times médios que precisam, go with Asana. If times de produto e matters more, Height is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.