Shortcut vs Wrike——どっちが優秀？
Shortcutを選ぶべき人: Trelloを卒業したがJiraは息苦しい — 10〜100人のエンジニアにちょうどいいスイートスポット
Wrikeを選ぶべき人: 複数の部門横断プロジェクトを回しつつ、重いレポーティングが必要なEnterprise向けチーム
私たちの見解: Shortcut for simplicity, Wrike for power users.
| Shortcut | Wrike | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Team $9.80/user/mo |
| 機能 | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams | Gantt charts and workload view, Cross-tagging across projects, Request forms and approvals, Time tracking built-in, 400+ integrations |
| こんな人に最適 | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers | Enterprise teams juggling multiple cross-functional projects with heavy reporting needs |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Shortcut stands out with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations. Wrike counters with Gantt charts and workload view and Cross-tagging across projects.
Shortcut's Achilles heel: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Wrike's: the ui feels dated and cluttered — onboarding new team members takes longer than it should. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and trelloを卒業したがjiraは息苦しい — 10〜100人のエンジニアにちょうどいいスイートスポット, go with Shortcut. If 複数の部門横断プロジェクトを回しつつ、重いレポーティングが必要なenterprise向けチーム matters more, Wrike is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.