Shortcut vs Teamwork——どっちが優秀？
Shortcutを選ぶべき人: Trelloを卒業したがJiraは息苦しい — 10〜100人のエンジニアにちょうどいいスイートスポット
Teamworkを選ぶべき人: プロジェクト管理にBillable Time Trackingを組み込みたいエージェンシーやクライアントサービスチーム
私たちの見解: Shortcut for simplicity, Teamwork for power users.
| Shortcut | Teamwork | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Deliver $13.99/user/mo |
| 機能 | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams | Client-facing project views, Time tracking and billing, Workload and profitability reporting, Task dependencies and milestones, Built-in chat |
| こんな人に最適 | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers | Agencies and client services teams that need billable time tracking baked into project management |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Shortcut stands out with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations. Teamwork counters with Client-facing project views and Workload and profitability reporting.
Shortcut's Achilles heel: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Teamwork's: the interface feels enterprise-heavy for small teams — too many menus for simple projects. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and trelloを卒業したがjiraは息苦しい — 10〜100人のエンジニアにちょうどいいスイートスポット, go with Shortcut. If プロジェクト管理にbillable time trackingを組み込みたいエージェンシーやクライアントサービスチーム matters more, Teamwork is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.