Penpot vs Webflow——どっちが優秀?

まとめ

Penpotを選ぶべき人: ベンダーロックインなしでセルフホスト可能なFigma代替を求めるオープンソース支持者

Webflowを選ぶべき人: 開発者なしで本番Webサイトを構築し、クリーンなコードをシップしたいデザイナー

私たちの見解: Penpot for simplicity, Webflow for power users.

 PenpotWebflow
料金Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricingFree with webflow.io subdomain and 2 pages | Basic $14/mo
機能Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototypingVisual CSS/HTML builder with full code control, Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content, Responsive design without writing media queries, Native hosting with global CDN and SSL, Interactions and animations with zero JavaScript
こんな人に最適Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-inDesigners who want to build production websites without developers — and actually ship clean code
学習コスト普通難しい

本当の違い

Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.

Penpot stands out with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design. Webflow counters with Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control and Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content.

Penpot's Achilles heel: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Webflow's: steep learning curve if you do not understand css concepts — it is visual but not simple. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.

結論

If you value open source and self-hostable and ベンダーロックインなしでセルフホスト可能なfigma代替を求めるオープンソース支持者, go with Penpot. If 開発者なしで本番webサイトを構築し、クリーンなコードをシップしたいデザイナー matters more, Webflow is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.

よくある質問

関連する比較