Penpot vs Rive——どっちが優秀？
Penpotを選ぶべき人: ベンダーロックインなしでセルフホスト可能なFigma代替を求めるオープンソース支持者
Riveを選ぶべき人: リアルタイムでユーザー入力に反応するインタラクティブアニメーションが必要なアプリ開発者やモーションデザイナー
私たちの見解: Penpot for simplicity, Rive for power users.
| Penpot | Rive | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricing | Free for 3 files with community features | Creator $14/mo |
| 機能 | Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototyping | State machine editor for interactive animations, Lightweight runtimes for iOS, Android, Web, and Flutter, Real-time collaboration on animation files, Bone-based rigging for character animation, Runtime event triggers for app logic integration |
| こんな人に最適 | Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-in | App developers and motion designers who need interactive animations that respond to user input in real time |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 難しい |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Penpot stands out with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design. Rive counters with State machine editor for interactive animations and Lightweight runtimes for iOS, Android, Web, and Flutter.
Penpot's Achilles heel: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Rive's: the state machine concept is powerful but intimidating — non-developers will hit a wall fast. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value open source and self-hostable and ベンダーロックインなしでセルフホスト可能なfigma代替を求めるオープンソース支持者, go with Penpot. If リアルタイムでユーザー入力に反応するインタラクティブアニメーションが必要なアプリ開発者やモーションデザイナー matters more, Rive is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.