OneDrive vs Sync.com——どっちが優秀？
OneDriveを選ぶべき人: Word・Excel・Outlookとシームレスに動くクラウドストレージが欲しいMicrosoft 365ユーザー
Sync.comを選ぶべき人: 追加料金なしでデフォルトのZero-Knowledge Encryptionが欲しいプライバシー第一のチーム
私たちの見解: OneDrive for simplicity, Sync.com for power users.
| OneDrive | Sync.com | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | 5 GB free | Microsoft 365 Basic $1.99/mo (100 GB) | 5 GB free | Teams Standard $6/user/mo (1 TB) |
| 機能 | Deep Microsoft 365 integration, Personal Vault for sensitive files, Real-time co-authoring in Office apps, Ransomware detection and recovery, Photo management and memories | End-to-end encryption by default, Zero-knowledge privacy, HIPAA and GDPR compliant, File requests and sharing, Vault for archived files |
| こんな人に最適 | Microsoft 365 users who want cloud storage that works seamlessly with Word, Excel, and Outlook | Privacy-first teams that want zero-knowledge encryption included by default with no extra cost |
| 学習コスト | 簡単 | 簡単 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
OneDrive stands out with Deep Microsoft 365 integration and Personal Vault for sensitive files. Sync.com counters with End-to-end encryption by default and Zero-knowledge privacy.
OneDrive's Achilles heel: sync client can be flaky — conflict files and mysterious sync failures still plague power users. Sync.com's: no native document editing — you have to download files, edit locally, and re-sync every time. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value deep microsoft 365 integration and word・excel・outlookとシームレスに動くクラウドストレージが欲しいmicrosoft 365ユーザー, go with OneDrive. If 追加料金なしでデフォルトのzero-knowledge encryptionが欲しいプライバシー第一のチーム matters more, Sync.com is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.