Loom vs Microsoft Teams——どっちが優秀？
Loomを選ぶべき人: 不要な会議を素早い非同期ビデオメッセージに置き換えたいリモートチーム
Microsoft Teamsを選ぶべき人: チャット・ビデオ・ファイルコラボレーションを1つのプラットフォームに統合したいMicrosoft 365組織
私たちの見解: Loom is easier to pick up, but Microsoft Teams is more powerful long-term.
| Loom | Microsoft Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for 25 videos (5 min each) | Business $15/user/mo | Free with 60-minute meetings (100 participants) | Microsoft 365 Business Basic $6/user/mo |
| 機能 | Async video messaging, Screen + webcam recording, AI transcription and summaries, Viewer engagement analytics, Comments and reactions on videos | Chat, channels, and video in one app, Screen sharing and whiteboard, Meeting recordings and transcription, Copilot AI assistant, SharePoint and OneDrive integration |
| こんな人に最適 | Remote teams that want to replace unnecessary meetings with quick async video messages | Microsoft 365 organizations that want chat, video, and file collaboration unified in one platform |
| 学習コスト | 簡単 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Loom stands out with Async video messaging and Viewer engagement analytics. Microsoft Teams counters with Chat, channels, and video in one app and Meeting recordings and transcription.
Loom's Achilles heel: not a real-time meeting tool — it’s async only, so you still need zoom or meet for live calls. Microsoft Teams's: bloated and resource-hungry — the app eats ram for breakfast and the ui is a maze of nested menus. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value async video messaging and 不要な会議を素早い非同期ビデオメッセージに置き換えたいリモートチーム, go with Loom. If チャット・ビデオ・ファイルコラボレーションを1つのプラットフォームに統合したいmicrosoft 365組織 matters more, Microsoft Teams is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.