InVision vs Penpot——どっちが優秀？
InVisionを選ぶべき人: 既存のデザインツールと併用して、軽量なプロトタイピングとホワイトボーディングが必要なチーム向け
Penpotを選ぶべき人: ベンダーロックインなしでセルフホスト可能なFigma代替を求めるオープンソース支持者
私たちの見解: InVision is easier to pick up, but Penpot is more powerful long-term.
| InVision | Penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo | Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricing |
| 機能 | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode | Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototyping |
| こんな人に最適 | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools | Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-in |
| 学習コスト | 簡単 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
InVision stands out with Freehand whiteboard and Inspect for developer handoff. Penpot counters with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design.
InVision's Achilles heel: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Penpot's: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value freehand whiteboard and 既存のデザインツールと併用して、軽量なプロトタイピングとホワイトボーディングが必要なチーム向け, go with InVision. If ベンダーロックインなしでセルフホスト可能なfigma代替を求めるオープンソース支持者 matters more, Penpot is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.