Height vs Smartsheet——どっちが優秀？
Heightを選ぶべき人: 後付けではなく、あらゆるプロジェクトアクションにAIが組み込まれたツールが欲しいプロダクト・エンジニアリングチーム
Smartsheetを選ぶべき人: スプレッドシートに住んでるけど、本格的なプロジェクト管理機能も欲しいチーム
私たちの見解: Height for simplicity, Smartsheet for power users.
| Height | Smartsheet | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo | No free plan (30-day trial) | Pro $9/user/mo |
| 機能 | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support | Spreadsheet-style project management, Gantt, card, and calendar views, Automated workflows, Resource management, Dashboards and reports |
| こんな人に最適 | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on | Teams that live in spreadsheets but need real project management features layered on top |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Height stands out with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering. Smartsheet counters with Spreadsheet-style project management and Gantt, card, and calendar views.
Height's Achilles heel: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Smartsheet's: it’s a spreadsheet pretending to be a pm tool — power users love it, everyone else gets confused. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value ai-powered task creation and prioritization and 後付けではなく、あらゆるプロジェクトアクションにaiが組み込まれたツールが欲しいプロダクト・エンジニアリングチーム, go with Height. If スプレッドシートに住んでるけど、本格的なプロジェクト管理機能も欲しいチーム matters more, Smartsheet is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.