Height vs Shortcut——どっちが優秀？
Heightを選ぶべき人: 後付けではなく、あらゆるプロジェクトアクションにAIが組み込まれたツールが欲しいプロダクト・エンジニアリングチーム
Shortcutを選ぶべき人: Trelloを卒業したがJiraは息苦しい — 10〜100人のエンジニアにちょうどいいスイートスポット
私たちの見解: Height for simplicity, Shortcut for power users.
| Height | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| 機能 | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| こんな人に最適 | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Height stands out with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Height's Achilles heel: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value ai-powered task creation and prioritization and 後付けではなく、あらゆるプロジェクトアクションにaiが組み込まれたツールが欲しいプロダクト・エンジニアリングチーム, go with Height. If trelloを卒業したがjiraは息苦しい — 10〜100人のエンジニアにちょうどいいスイートスポット matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.