Greenhouse vs Lever——どっちが優秀？
Greenhouseを選ぶべき人: 本格的なアナリティクスとコンプライアンス付きの構造化されたバイアス低減採用プロセスが欲しいスケーリング企業
Leverを選ぶべき人: プロアクティブなソーシングのためにRecruiting CRM機能をATSと融合したいミッドマーケット企業
私たちの見解: Greenhouse for simplicity, Lever for power users.
| Greenhouse | Lever | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Essential custom pricing | LeverTRM custom pricing |
| 機能 | Structured hiring methodology, Interview kits and scorecards, DE&I tracking and analytics, Onboarding module, 500+ integrations | ATS + CRM in one platform, Diversity and inclusion analytics, Interview scheduling and scorecards, Nurture campaigns for passive candidates, Visual pipeline management |
| こんな人に最適 | Scaling companies that want structured, bias-reduced hiring processes with serious analytics and compliance | Mid-market companies that want recruiting CRM capabilities blended with ATS for proactive sourcing |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Greenhouse stands out with Structured hiring methodology and DE&I tracking and analytics. Lever counters with ATS + CRM in one platform and Diversity and inclusion analytics.
Greenhouse's Achilles heel: enterprise pricing with zero transparency — expect $6,000–15,000+/year depending on headcount. Lever's: no public pricing — you’re forced into a sales call, and it’s not cheap once you get the quote. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value structured hiring methodology and 本格的なアナリティクスとコンプライアンス付きの構造化されたバイアス低減採用プロセスが欲しいスケーリング企業, go with Greenhouse. If プロアクティブなソーシングのためにrecruiting crm機能をatsと融合したいミッドマーケット企業 matters more, Lever is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.