Framer vs InVision——どっちが優秀？
Framerを選ぶべき人: デザインツールから直接、コードに触れずに本番Webサイトをシップしたいデザイナー
InVisionを選ぶべき人: 既存のデザインツールと併用して、軽量なプロトタイピングとホワイトボーディングが必要なチーム向け
私たちの見解: Framer for simplicity, InVision for power users.
| Framer | InVision | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free plan (Framer subdomain) | Mini $5/mo | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo |
| 機能 | Design-to-website publishing, Responsive breakpoints, CMS and dynamic content, Motion animations, Component variants | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode |
| こんな人に最適 | Designers who want to ship real websites directly from their design tool without touching code | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 簡単 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Framer stands out with Design-to-website publishing and Responsive breakpoints. InVision counters with Freehand whiteboard and Prototyping and animations.
Framer's Achilles heel: it’s a website builder disguised as a design tool — complex web apps are out of scope entirely. InVision's: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value design-to-website publishing and デザインツールから直接、コードに触れずに本番webサイトをシップしたいデザイナー, go with Framer. If 既存のデザインツールと併用して、軽量なプロトタイピングとホワイトボーディングが必要なチーム向け matters more, InVision is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.