Figma vs Webflow——どっちが優秀？
Figmaを選ぶべき人: リアルタイムコラボレーションとシームレスなデベロッパーハンドオフが必要なデザインチーム向け
Webflowを選ぶべき人: 開発者なしで本番Webサイトを構築し、クリーンなコードをシップしたいデザイナー
私たちの見解: Figma for simplicity, Webflow for power users.
| Figma | Webflow | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for up to 3 projects | Professional $12/editor/mo | Free with webflow.io subdomain and 2 pages | Basic $14/mo |
| 機能 | Real-time collaboration, Auto Layout, Component variants and variables, Dev mode for handoff, FigJam whiteboard | Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control, Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content, Responsive design without writing media queries, Native hosting with global CDN and SSL, Interactions and animations with zero JavaScript |
| こんな人に最適 | Design teams that need real-time collaboration and seamless developer handoff | Designers who want to build production websites without developers — and actually ship clean code |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 難しい |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Figma stands out with Real-time collaboration and Auto Layout. Webflow counters with Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control and Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content.
Figma's Achilles heel: requires internet connection — offline mode is limited and the desktop app is basically a browser wrapper. Webflow's: steep learning curve if you do not understand css concepts — it is visual but not simple. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value real-time collaboration and リアルタイムコラボレーションとシームレスなデベロッパーハンドオフが必要なデザインチーム向け, go with Figma. If 開発者なしで本番webサイトを構築し、クリーンなコードをシップしたいデザイナー matters more, Webflow is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.