Close vs Copper——どっちが優秀？
Closeを選ぶべき人: 電話で勝負するインサイドセールスチームで、CRMに通話機能を直接組み込みたい人向け
Copperを選ぶべき人: Google Workspaceユーザーで、GmailとCalendarの中にCRMを置きたい — コンテキスト切替ゼロ
私たちの見解: Close for simplicity, Copper for power users.
| Close | Copper | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Startup $49/user/mo | Starter $9/user/mo |
| 機能 | Built-in calling and SMS, Email sequences, Pipeline and activity reporting, Smart Views for filtering, Predictive dialer | Native Google Workspace integration, Automatic data entry from Gmail, Pipeline management, Workflow automations, Activity tracking |
| こんな人に最適 | Inside sales teams that live on the phone and want calling built directly into their CRM | Google Workspace shops that want a CRM living inside Gmail and Calendar with zero context-switching |
| 学習コスト | 簡単 | 簡単 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Close stands out with Built-in calling and SMS and Email sequences. Copper counters with Native Google Workspace integration and Automatic data entry from Gmail.
Close's Achilles heel: no free plan and expensive entry point — $49/user/mo is steep for early-stage startups. Copper's: useless outside the google ecosystem — if you use outlook or other email, look elsewhere. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value built-in calling and sms and 電話で勝負するインサイドセールスチームで、crmに通話機能を直接組み込みたい人向け, go with Close. If google workspaceユーザーで、gmailとcalendarの中にcrmを置きたい — コンテキスト切替ゼロ matters more, Copper is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.