Capacities vs Tana——どっちが優秀？
Capacitiesを選ぶべき人: Notionの柔軟性を持ちつつ、よりパーソナルでオブジェクト指向のナレッジシステムが欲しいビジュアル思考家
Tanaを選ぶべき人: 構造化された検索可能なノートで、自分だけのパーソナルOSを構築したいパワーユーザー
私たちの見解: Capacities for simplicity, Tana for power users.
| Capacities | Tana | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for personal use | Pro $9.99/mo | Free for personal use | Tana Pro $10/mo |
| 機能 | Object-based note system, Daily notes and journals, Media management, Tag-based organization, Graph view of connections | Supertag-based schema system, Live search nodes, Command node automations, AI integration built-in, Outliner with structured data |
| こんな人に最適 | Visual thinkers who want Notion’s flexibility with a more personal, object-oriented knowledge system | Power users who want to build their own personal operating system with structured, queryable notes |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 難しい |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Capacities stands out with Object-based note system and Daily notes and journals. Tana counters with Supertag-based schema system and Live search nodes.
Capacities's Achilles heel: young product with missing features — no api, limited integrations, and collaboration is early-stage. Tana's: steep learning cliff — the supertag concept is powerful but takes days to grok properly. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value object-based note system and notionの柔軟性を持ちつつ、よりパーソナルでオブジェクト指向のナレッジシステムが欲しいビジュアル思考家, go with Capacities. If 構造化された検索可能なノートで、自分だけのパーソナルosを構築したいパワーユーザー matters more, Tana is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.