Capacities vs Roam Research——どっちが優秀？
Capacitiesを選ぶべき人: Notionの柔軟性を持ちつつ、よりパーソナルでオブジェクト指向のナレッジシステムが欲しいビジュアル思考家
Roam Researchを選ぶべき人: つながったアイデアで思考し、ブロックレベルのリンキングが欲しい研究者やライター向け
私たちの見解: Capacities for simplicity, Roam Research for power users.
| Capacities | Roam Research | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for personal use | Pro $9.99/mo | No free plan | Pro $15/mo |
| 機能 | Object-based note system, Daily notes and journals, Media management, Tag-based organization, Graph view of connections | Bidirectional linking, Block-level references, Daily notes workflow, Graph overview, Custom CSS and JavaScript |
| こんな人に最適 | Visual thinkers who want Notion’s flexibility with a more personal, object-oriented knowledge system | Researchers and writers who think in connected ideas and want block-level linking |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 難しい |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Capacities stands out with Object-based note system and Media management. Roam Research counters with Bidirectional linking and Block-level references.
Capacities's Achilles heel: young product with missing features — no api, limited integrations, and collaboration is early-stage. Roam Research's: no free plan, web-only (no native desktop), and the community has shrunk as obsidian and logseq grew. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value object-based note system and notionの柔軟性を持ちつつ、よりパーソナルでオブジェクト指向のナレッジシステムが欲しいビジュアル思考家, go with Capacities. If つながったアイデアで思考し、ブロックレベルのリンキングが欲しい研究者やライター向け matters more, Roam Research is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.