Basecamp vs Height——どっちが優秀？
Basecampを選ぶべき人: 細かいタスク管理よりも、シンプルさと非同期コミュニケーションを大事にするリモートチーム向け
Heightを選ぶべき人: 後付けではなく、あらゆるプロジェクトアクションにAIが組み込まれたツールが欲しいプロダクト・エンジニアリングチーム
私たちの見解: Basecamp is easier to pick up, but Height is more powerful long-term.
| Basecamp | Height | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | No free plan (30-day trial) | Basecamp $15/user/mo | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| 機能 | Message boards, To-do lists, Schedules and check-ins, File storage, Hill charts for progress tracking | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support |
| こんな人に最適 | Remote teams that value simplicity and async communication over granular task management | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on |
| 学習コスト | 簡単 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Basecamp stands out with Message boards and To-do lists. Height counters with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering.
Basecamp's Achilles heel: no gantt charts, no time tracking, no custom fields — intentionally opinionated but limiting for complex work. Height's: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value message boards and 細かいタスク管理よりも、シンプルさと非同期コミュニケーションを大事にするリモートチーム向け, go with Basecamp. If 後付けではなく、あらゆるプロジェクトアクションにaiが組み込まれたツールが欲しいプロダクト・エンジニアリングチーム matters more, Height is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.