Asana vs Shortcut——どっちが優秀？
Asanaを選ぶべき人: 開発者レベルの複雑さなしで、構造化されたプロジェクトワークフローが必要な中規模チーム向け
Shortcutを選ぶべき人: Trelloを卒業したがJiraは息苦しい — 10〜100人のエンジニアにちょうどいいスイートスポット
私たちの見解: Asana for simplicity, Shortcut for power users.
| Asana | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| 機能 | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| こんな人に最適 | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Workflow automation and Custom fields and forms. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value workflow automation and 開発者レベルの複雑さなしで、構造化されたプロジェクトワークフローが必要な中規模チーム向け, go with Asana. If trelloを卒業したがjiraは息苦しい — 10〜100人のエンジニアにちょうどいいスイートスポット matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.