Asana vs Height——どっちが優秀？
Asanaを選ぶべき人: 開発者レベルの複雑さなしで、構造化されたプロジェクトワークフローが必要な中規模チーム向け
Heightを選ぶべき人: 後付けではなく、あらゆるプロジェクトアクションにAIが組み込まれたツールが欲しいプロダクト・エンジニアリングチーム
私たちの見解: Asana for simplicity, Height for power users.
| Asana | Height | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| 機能 | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support |
| こんな人に最適 | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on |
| 学習コスト | 普通 | 普通 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Timeline and Gantt views and Workflow automation. Height counters with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Height's: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value timeline and gantt views and 開発者レベルの複雑さなしで、構造化されたプロジェクトワークフローが必要な中規模チーム向け, go with Asana. If 後付けではなく、あらゆるプロジェクトアクションにaiが組み込まれたツールが欲しいプロダクト・エンジニアリングチーム matters more, Height is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.