Around vs Loom——どっちが優秀？
Aroundを選ぶべき人: Miroを使っていて、ワークスペースを離れずに軽量ビデオ通話がしたいデザイン・プロダクトチーム
Loomを選ぶべき人: 不要な会議を素早い非同期ビデオメッセージに置き換えたいリモートチーム
私たちの見解: Around for simplicity, Loom for power users.
| Around | Loom | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | Free (now part of Miro) | Included with Miro paid plans | Free for 25 videos (5 min each) | Business $15/user/mo |
| 機能 | Floating circle video bubbles, Auto noise cancellation, Low bandwidth optimization, Screen sharing, Miro whiteboard integration | Async video messaging, Screen + webcam recording, AI transcription and summaries, Viewer engagement analytics, Comments and reactions on videos |
| こんな人に最適 | Design and product teams already using Miro who want lightweight video calls without leaving their workspace | Remote teams that want to replace unnecessary meetings with quick async video messages |
| 学習コスト | 簡単 | 簡単 |
本当の違い
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Around stands out with Floating circle video bubbles and Auto noise cancellation. Loom counters with Async video messaging and AI transcription and summaries.
Around's Achilles heel: absorbed into miro — standalone product identity is fading, and you’re locked into miro’s ecosystem now. Loom's: not a real-time meeting tool — it’s async only, so you still need zoom or meet for live calls. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
結論
If you value floating circle video bubbles and miroを使っていて、ワークスペースを離れずに軽量ビデオ通話がしたいデザイン・プロダクトチーム, go with Around. If 不要な会議を素早い非同期ビデオメッセージに置き換えたいリモートチーム matters more, Loom is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.