Asana vs Shortcut — Mana yang Lebih Unggul?
Pilih Asana jika: Tim menengah yang membutuhkan alur kerja proyek terstruktur tanpa kompleksitas tingkat developer
Pilih Shortcut jika: Tim software yang sudah melampaui Trello tapi merasa Jira terlalu menyesakkan — sweet spot untuk 10–100 engineer
Pendapat kami: Asana for simplicity, Shortcut for power users.
| Asana | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| Harga | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| Fitur | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| Terbaik untuk | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| Tingkat kemudahan | Sedang | Sedang |
Perbedaan Sesungguhnya
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Workflow automation and Custom fields and forms. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Kesimpulan
If you value workflow automation and tim menengah yang membutuhkan, go with Asana. If tim software yang sudah matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.