Teamwork vs Wrike — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Teamwork si: Les agences et équipes de service client qui ont besoin du suivi de temps facturable intégré au project management
Choisissez Wrike si: Les équipes enterprise qui jonglent avec plusieurs projets transversaux et ont besoin de reporting lourd
Notre avis: Teamwork for simplicity, Wrike for power users.
| Teamwork | Wrike | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for up to 5 users | Deliver $13.99/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Team $9.80/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Client-facing project views, Time tracking and billing, Workload and profitability reporting, Task dependencies and milestones, Built-in chat | Gantt charts and workload view, Cross-tagging across projects, Request forms and approvals, Time tracking built-in, 400+ integrations |
| Idéal pour | Agencies and client services teams that need billable time tracking baked into project management | Enterprise teams juggling multiple cross-functional projects with heavy reporting needs |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Teamwork stands out with Client-facing project views and Task dependencies and milestones. Wrike counters with Gantt charts and workload view and Cross-tagging across projects.
Teamwork's Achilles heel: the interface feels enterprise-heavy for small teams — too many menus for simple projects. Wrike's: the ui feels dated and cluttered — onboarding new team members takes longer than it should. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value client-facing project views and les agences et équipes, go with Teamwork. If les équipes enterprise qui matters more, Wrike is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.