Shortcut vs Teamwork — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Shortcut si: Les équipes software qui ont dépassé Trello mais trouvent Jira étouffant — le sweet spot pour 10-100 ingénieurs
Choisissez Teamwork si: Les agences et équipes de service client qui ont besoin du suivi de temps facturable intégré au project management
Notre avis: Shortcut for simplicity, Teamwork for power users.
| Shortcut | Teamwork | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Deliver $13.99/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams | Client-facing project views, Time tracking and billing, Workload and profitability reporting, Task dependencies and milestones, Built-in chat |
| Idéal pour | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers | Agencies and client services teams that need billable time tracking baked into project management |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Shortcut stands out with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations. Teamwork counters with Client-facing project views and Workload and profitability reporting.
Shortcut's Achilles heel: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Teamwork's: the interface feels enterprise-heavy for small teams — too many menus for simple projects. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and les équipes software qui, go with Shortcut. If les agences et équipes matters more, Teamwork is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.