Penpot vs Webflow — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Penpot si: Les défenseurs de l'open-source qui veulent une alternative self-hosted à Figma sans vendor lock-in
Choisissez Webflow si: Les designers qui veulent construire des sites de production sans développeurs — et livrer du code propre
Notre avis: Penpot for simplicity, Webflow for power users.
| Penpot | Webflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricing | Free with webflow.io subdomain and 2 pages | Basic $14/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototyping | Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control, Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content, Responsive design without writing media queries, Native hosting with global CDN and SSL, Interactions and animations with zero JavaScript |
| Idéal pour | Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-in | Designers who want to build production websites without developers — and actually ship clean code |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Difficile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Penpot stands out with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design. Webflow counters with Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control and Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content.
Penpot's Achilles heel: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Webflow's: steep learning curve if you do not understand css concepts — it is visual but not simple. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value open source and self-hostable and les défenseurs de l'open-source, go with Penpot. If les designers qui veulent matters more, Webflow is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.