Lever vs Rippling — Lequel l'emporte ?

En bref

Choisissez Lever si: Les entreprises mid-market qui veulent des capacités de CRM recrutement mêlées à un ATS pour du sourcing proactif

Choisissez Rippling si: Les entreprises en croissance qui veulent RH, IT et gestion des appareils unifiés sur une plateforme avec paie mondiale

Notre avis: Lever for simplicity, Rippling for power users.

 LeverRippling
TarifsLeverTRM custom pricingStarts at $8/user/mo
FonctionnalitésATS + CRM in one platform, Diversity and inclusion analytics, Interview scheduling and scorecards, Nurture campaigns for passive candidates, Visual pipeline managementUnified HR, IT, and finance platform, Global payroll in 50+ countries, Device management, App provisioning and SSO, Custom workflow automation
Idéal pourMid-market companies that want recruiting CRM capabilities blended with ATS for proactive sourcingGrowing companies that want HR, IT, and device management unified in one platform with global payroll
Courbe d'apprentissageMoyenMoyen

La vraie différence

Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.

Lever stands out with ATS + CRM in one platform and Diversity and inclusion analytics. Rippling counters with Unified HR, IT, and finance platform and Global payroll in 50+ countries.

Lever's Achilles heel: no public pricing — you’re forced into a sales call, and it’s not cheap once you get the quote. Rippling's: modular pricing means costs stack up fast — the base is cheap but every add-on module costs extra. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.

Le verdict

If you value ats + crm in one platform and les entreprises mid-market qui, go with Lever. If les entreprises en croissance matters more, Rippling is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.

Questions fréquentes

Comparaisons similaires