InVision vs Webflow — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez InVision si: Les équipes qui ont besoin de prototypage léger et de whiteboarding en complément de leurs outils design existants
Choisissez Webflow si: Les designers qui veulent construire des sites de production sans développeurs — et livrer du code propre
Notre avis: InVision is easier to pick up, but Webflow is more powerful long-term.
| InVision | Webflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo | Free with webflow.io subdomain and 2 pages | Basic $14/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode | Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control, Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content, Responsive design without writing media queries, Native hosting with global CDN and SSL, Interactions and animations with zero JavaScript |
| Idéal pour | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools | Designers who want to build production websites without developers — and actually ship clean code |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Facile | Difficile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
InVision stands out with Freehand whiteboard and Prototyping and animations. Webflow counters with Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control and Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content.
InVision's Achilles heel: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Webflow's: steep learning curve if you do not understand css concepts — it is visual but not simple. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value freehand whiteboard and les équipes qui ont, go with InVision. If les designers qui veulent matters more, Webflow is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.