InVision vs Marvel — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez InVision si: Les équipes qui ont besoin de prototypage léger et de whiteboarding en complément de leurs outils design existants
Choisissez Marvel si: Les équipes UX qui veulent le chemin le plus court du wireframe au prototype cliquable avec tests utilisateurs intégrés
Notre avis: InVision for simplicity, Marvel for power users.
| InVision | Marvel | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo | Free for 1 project | Pro $12/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode | Rapid prototyping, User testing built-in, Design handoff specs, Wireframing tools, Sketch and Figma import |
| Idéal pour | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools | UX teams that want the fastest path from wireframe to clickable prototype with built-in user testing |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Facile | Facile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
InVision stands out with Freehand whiteboard and Inspect for developer handoff. Marvel counters with Rapid prototyping and User testing built-in.
InVision's Achilles heel: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Marvel's: not a full design tool — you still need figma or sketch for actual visual design work. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value freehand whiteboard and les équipes qui ont, go with InVision. If les équipes ux qui matters more, Marvel is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.