Hive vs Shortcut — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Hive si: Les équipes rapides qui veulent un outil moderne et complet avec email et fonctionnalités AI intégrés
Choisissez Shortcut si: Les équipes software qui ont dépassé Trello mais trouvent Jira étouffant — le sweet spot pour 10-100 ingénieurs
Notre avis: Hive is easier to pick up, but Shortcut is more powerful long-term.
| Hive | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for up to 10 users | Teams $18/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Gantt, kanban, and calendar views, Native email integration, Time tracking and resourcing, AI-powered task summaries, Proofing and approvals | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| Idéal pour | Fast-moving teams that want a modern all-rounder with built-in email and AI features | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Facile | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Hive stands out with Gantt, kanban, and calendar views and Native email integration. Shortcut counters with Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations and Docs and wikis inside the project tool.
Hive's Achilles heel: pricing jumps hard from free to paid — $18/user/mo with no mid-tier option. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value gantt, kanban, and calendar views and les équipes rapides qui, go with Hive. If les équipes software qui matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.