Height vs Linear — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Height si: Les équipes produit et ingénierie qui veulent l'AI intégrée dans chaque action de projet — pas collée par-dessus
Choisissez Linear si: Les équipes d'ingénierie qui veulent le tracker d'issues le plus rapide et le plus tranché du marché
Notre avis: Height for simplicity, Linear for power users.
| Height | Linear | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 250 issues | Standard $8/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support | Keyboard-first navigation, Cycles and roadmaps, Git and PR integrations, Triage and auto-assignment, Sub-issues and relations |
| Idéal pour | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on | Engineering teams that want the fastest, most opinionated issue tracker on the market |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Facile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Height stands out with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering. Linear counters with Keyboard-first navigation and Cycles and roadmaps.
Height's Achilles heel: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Linear's: built for devs by devs — non-technical teams will feel alienated by the workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value ai-powered task creation and prioritization and les équipes produit et, go with Height. If les équipes d'ingénierie qui matters more, Linear is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.