Greenhouse vs Workday — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Greenhouse si: Les entreprises en scale qui veulent des processus d'embauche structurés et anti-biais avec des analytics sérieux et de la compliance
Choisissez Workday si: Les grandes enterprises (1 000+ employés) qui veulent une plateforme unifiée RH, finance et planning à l'échelle mondiale
Notre avis: Greenhouse for simplicity, Workday for power users.
| Greenhouse | Workday | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Essential custom pricing | Custom enterprise pricing (typically $100+/user/year) |
| Fonctionnalités | Structured hiring methodology, Interview kits and scorecards, DE&I tracking and analytics, Onboarding module, 500+ integrations | Enterprise HCM platform, Financial management, Workforce planning and analytics, Learning management system, Talent management and succession planning |
| Idéal pour | Scaling companies that want structured, bias-reduced hiring processes with serious analytics and compliance | Large enterprises (1,000+ employees) that want a unified HR, finance, and planning platform at global scale |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Difficile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Greenhouse stands out with Structured hiring methodology and Interview kits and scorecards. Workday counters with Enterprise HCM platform and Financial management.
Greenhouse's Achilles heel: enterprise pricing with zero transparency — expect $6,000–15,000+/year depending on headcount. Workday's: massively expensive and requires dedicated admins — implementation takes 6–12 months and costs six figures. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value structured hiring methodology and les entreprises en scale, go with Greenhouse. If les grandes enterprises (1 matters more, Workday is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.