Greenhouse vs Rippling — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Greenhouse si: Les entreprises en scale qui veulent des processus d'embauche structurés et anti-biais avec des analytics sérieux et de la compliance
Choisissez Rippling si: Les entreprises en croissance qui veulent RH, IT et gestion des appareils unifiés sur une plateforme avec paie mondiale
Notre avis: Greenhouse for simplicity, Rippling for power users.
| Greenhouse | Rippling | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Essential custom pricing | Starts at $8/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Structured hiring methodology, Interview kits and scorecards, DE&I tracking and analytics, Onboarding module, 500+ integrations | Unified HR, IT, and finance platform, Global payroll in 50+ countries, Device management, App provisioning and SSO, Custom workflow automation |
| Idéal pour | Scaling companies that want structured, bias-reduced hiring processes with serious analytics and compliance | Growing companies that want HR, IT, and device management unified in one platform with global payroll |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Greenhouse stands out with Structured hiring methodology and Interview kits and scorecards. Rippling counters with Unified HR, IT, and finance platform and Global payroll in 50+ countries.
Greenhouse's Achilles heel: enterprise pricing with zero transparency — expect $6,000–15,000+/year depending on headcount. Rippling's: modular pricing means costs stack up fast — the base is cheap but every add-on module costs extra. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value structured hiring methodology and les entreprises en scale, go with Greenhouse. If les entreprises en croissance matters more, Rippling is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.