Greenhouse vs Lever — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Greenhouse si: Les entreprises en scale qui veulent des processus d'embauche structurés et anti-biais avec des analytics sérieux et de la compliance
Choisissez Lever si: Les entreprises mid-market qui veulent des capacités de CRM recrutement mêlées à un ATS pour du sourcing proactif
Notre avis: Greenhouse for simplicity, Lever for power users.
| Greenhouse | Lever | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Essential custom pricing | LeverTRM custom pricing |
| Fonctionnalités | Structured hiring methodology, Interview kits and scorecards, DE&I tracking and analytics, Onboarding module, 500+ integrations | ATS + CRM in one platform, Diversity and inclusion analytics, Interview scheduling and scorecards, Nurture campaigns for passive candidates, Visual pipeline management |
| Idéal pour | Scaling companies that want structured, bias-reduced hiring processes with serious analytics and compliance | Mid-market companies that want recruiting CRM capabilities blended with ATS for proactive sourcing |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Greenhouse stands out with Structured hiring methodology and DE&I tracking and analytics. Lever counters with ATS + CRM in one platform and Diversity and inclusion analytics.
Greenhouse's Achilles heel: enterprise pricing with zero transparency — expect $6,000–15,000+/year depending on headcount. Lever's: no public pricing — you’re forced into a sales call, and it’s not cheap once you get the quote. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value structured hiring methodology and les entreprises en scale, go with Greenhouse. If les entreprises mid-market qui matters more, Lever is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.