Greenhouse vs Gusto — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Greenhouse si: Les entreprises en scale qui veulent des processus d'embauche structurés et anti-biais avec des analytics sérieux et de la compliance
Choisissez Gusto si: Les petites boîtes US qui veulent paie, avantages et RH bundlés ensemble avec des déclarations fiscales ultra-simples
Notre avis: Greenhouse for simplicity, Gusto for power users.
| Greenhouse | Gusto | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Essential custom pricing | Simple $40/mo + $6/person/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Structured hiring methodology, Interview kits and scorecards, DE&I tracking and analytics, Onboarding module, 500+ integrations | Full-service payroll, Benefits administration, Automated tax filing, Onboarding workflows, Time tracking and PTO |
| Idéal pour | Scaling companies that want structured, bias-reduced hiring processes with serious analytics and compliance | US small businesses that want payroll, benefits, and HR bundled together with dead-simple tax filing |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Facile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Greenhouse stands out with Structured hiring methodology and Interview kits and scorecards. Gusto counters with Full-service payroll and Benefits administration.
Greenhouse's Achilles heel: enterprise pricing with zero transparency — expect $6,000–15,000+/year depending on headcount. Gusto's: us-only — no international payroll, and the per-person pricing gets expensive as your headcount grows. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value structured hiring methodology and les entreprises en scale, go with Greenhouse. If les petites boîtes us matters more, Gusto is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.