Google Meet vs Loom — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Google Meet si: Les équipes Google Workspace qui veulent des appels vidéo sans friction depuis Calendar et Gmail
Choisissez Loom si: Les équipes remote qui veulent remplacer les réunions inutiles par des messages vidéo asynchrones rapides
Notre avis: Google Meet for simplicity, Loom for power users.
| Google Meet | Loom | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for 60-minute meetings (100 participants) | Google Workspace Starter $7.20/user/mo | Free for 25 videos (5 min each) | Business $15/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | No download required (browser-based), Live captions and translation, Meeting recordings (paid), Noise cancellation, Deep Google Calendar integration | Async video messaging, Screen + webcam recording, AI transcription and summaries, Viewer engagement analytics, Comments and reactions on videos |
| Idéal pour | Google Workspace teams who want frictionless video calls that just work from Calendar and Gmail | Remote teams that want to replace unnecessary meetings with quick async video messages |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Facile | Facile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Google Meet stands out with No download required (browser-based) and Live captions and translation. Loom counters with Async video messaging and Screen + webcam recording.
Google Meet's Achilles heel: feature-light compared to zoom — no breakout rooms on free plan, limited recording, fewer controls. Loom's: not a real-time meeting tool — it’s async only, so you still need zoom or meet for live calls. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value no download required (browser-based) and les équipes google workspace, go with Google Meet. If les équipes remote qui matters more, Loom is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.