Framer vs Penpot — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Framer si: Les designers qui veulent publier de vrais sites web directement depuis leur outil de design sans toucher au code
Choisissez Penpot si: Les défenseurs de l'open-source qui veulent une alternative self-hosted à Figma sans vendor lock-in
Notre avis: Framer for simplicity, Penpot for power users.
| Framer | Penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free plan (Framer subdomain) | Mini $5/mo | Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricing |
| Fonctionnalités | Design-to-website publishing, Responsive breakpoints, CMS and dynamic content, Motion animations, Component variants | Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototyping |
| Idéal pour | Designers who want to ship real websites directly from their design tool without touching code | Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-in |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Framer stands out with Design-to-website publishing and Responsive breakpoints. Penpot counters with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design.
Framer's Achilles heel: it’s a website builder disguised as a design tool — complex web apps are out of scope entirely. Penpot's: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value design-to-website publishing and les designers qui veulent, go with Framer. If les défenseurs de l'open-source matters more, Penpot is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.